Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron
97 Pontuação geral
vs
Samyang AF 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC 50mm

Samyang AF 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC 50mm

Samyang
35 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Video Cinema
Tamron
98
Samyang
23
Budget
Tamron
96
Samyang
33
Macro
Tamron
95
Samyang
45
Professional
Tamron
92
Samyang
25
Travel
Tamron
87
Samyang
24
Portrait
Tamron
85
Samyang
25
Landscape
Tamron
84
Samyang
30
Street
Tamron
79
Samyang
27
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
75
Samyang
20

Especificações

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mmSamyang AF 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm50 mm
Elements169
Groups126
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements2★1
CoatingFluorine CoatingUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★8
Build
MountSony ECanon EF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.54 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeRXDmanual focus only
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification1:4.81:6.25

Prós e Contras

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile

Samyang AF 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC 50mm

  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Preços

Samyang AF 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC 50mm is MX$ 9.479 cheaper (2.8x less).

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Samyang AF 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC 50mm

Veredito

★ Vencedor: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Considere também