OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

OM System
66 Pontuação geral
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Professional
OM System
63
Sigma
98
Portrait
OM System
44
Sigma
90
Street
OM System
51
Sigma
88
Budget
OM System
67
Sigma
85
Video Cinema
OM System
59
Sigma
85
Macro
OM System
47
Sigma
83
Wildlife Sports
OM System
55
Sigma
80
Landscape
OM System
68
Sigma
77
Travel
OM System
63
Sigma
75

Especificações

OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PROSigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min40 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max150 mm28 mm
Elements1616
Groups1011
Aspherical Elements24
ED Elements35
CoatingZERO coatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.76 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeDual VCMStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance700 mm250 mm
Max Magnification0.21x1:5.55

Prós e Contras

OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Veredito

Vencedor: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports