Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm
Olympus
51 Pontuação geral
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Street
Portrait
Especificações
| Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 12 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 12 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 17 |
| Groups | 8 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| Coating | ZERO Coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | L-Mount |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.13 kg★ | 0.41 kg |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | MSC | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 200 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.08x | 0.5x★ |
Prós e Contras
Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong optical (71st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong build (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preços
Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm0.002pontos por dólar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.004pontos por dólar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm oferece 2.0x melhor custo-benefício
Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Veredito
Vencedor: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
