Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
Tamron
55 Pontuação geral
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
94 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Professional
Portrait
Budget
Street
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Especificações
| Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Prós e Contras
Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (76th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (74th percentile)
- Strong macro (70th percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preços
Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
No current pricing available
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Veredito
Vencedor: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
