HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

HK Meike
43 Pontuação geral
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
91 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Travel
HK Meike
37
Sony
99
Budget
HK Meike
46
Sony
91
Street
HK Meike
54
Sony
90
Video Cinema
HK Meike
40
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
HK Meike
35
Sony
84
Landscape
HK Meike
24
Sony
79
Portrait
HK Meike
51
Sony
77
Professional
HK Meike
35
Sony
77
Macro
HK Meike
20
Sony
68

Especificações

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 ESony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements—9
Groups—8
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—1★
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/3.5
Min Aperturef/23.5-5.6
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
Mount—Sony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.29 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread—41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Autofocus
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—250 mm★
Max Magnification—0.215x★

Prós e Contras

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (65th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Preços

Both products are similarly priced.

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E0.013pontos por dólar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.028pontos por dólar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS oferece 2.2x melhor custo-benefício

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Veredito

★ Vencedor: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Considere também