Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
93 Pontuação geral
vs
Google Pixel Buds Pro
Google
82 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Budget
Commute
Travel
Calls
Fitness
Gaming
Music
Especificações
| Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | Google Pixel Buds Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | l |
| Weight | 0.09 kg | 0.06 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 11 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 140 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | Fast Charging,Noise Cancellation,Sweatproof,Microphone Included,Transparency Mode,Water Resistant |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.0 |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 11 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | Fast Charging |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs | 31 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 2 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Google Assistant |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | IPX4 |
Prós e Contras
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Google Pixel Buds Pro
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
Veredito
Vencedor: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 93 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 3 of 33 specs.