Bowers & Wilkins FP45799

Bowers & Wilkins FP45799

Bowers & Wilkins
14 Pontuação geral
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100-S

Technics EAH-AZ100-S

Technics
99 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Calls
Bowers & Wilkins
6
Technics
99
Travel
Bowers & Wilkins
12
Technics
98
Budget
Bowers & Wilkins
19
Technics
92
Music
Bowers & Wilkins
14
Technics
90
Commute
Bowers & Wilkins
10
Technics
89
Gaming
Bowers & Wilkins
6
Technics
87
Fitness
Bowers & Wilkins
8
Technics
79

Especificações

Bowers & Wilkins FP45799Technics EAH-AZ100-S
Design
Form Factorin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear Tips5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.05 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz
Impedance16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4

Prós e Contras

Bowers & Wilkins FP45799

  • Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100-S

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile

Veredito

Vencedor: Technics EAH-AZ100-S

Scores 99 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 38 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-S Melhor em:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness