Sony WF-1000XM5

★★★★☆ 4.0 (21,400)

Met de dubbele ruisonderdrukkingsprocessors, de 8,4 mm Dynamic Driver X en een batterijduur van 8 uur (24 uur met case, 3 min laden voor 60 min) leveren de WF-1000XM5 de beste actieve ruisonderdrukking in hun klasse. De AI-gestuurde gespreksruisreductie met botgeleidingssensor garandeert kristalheldere oproepen, terwijl het compacte, luxe ontwerp en IPX4 spatwaterbestendigheid en comfort bieden. Ideaal voor forenzen en reizigers die in rumoerige omgevingen absolute stilte en storingsvrije telefoongesprekken eisen.

form factor in-ear
driver type dynamic
Wireless Ja
active noise cancellation Ja
bluetooth version 5.3
battery life hours 8
case battery hours 24
water resistance IPX4
Sony WF-1000XM5 earbuds
90 Totaalscore
Ook beschikbaar in:

Overzicht

The 30-Second Version

The Sony WF-1000XM5s are comfortable, but that's where the good news ends. Battery life is terrible, sound and ANC are mediocre, and call quality is a letdown. Only consider these if you find a deep discount and comfort is your absolute top priority.

Pros & Cons

Pluspunten

  • Comfort is genuinely good, sitting well above average. 100th
  • The smaller, lighter design is a nice upgrade for pocketability. 99th
  • Foam ear tips provide a secure, comfortable seal. 97th
  • Integrated Processor V2 handles audio processing efficiently. 97th

Minpunten

  • Battery life is abysmal, ranking near the very bottom of our database.
  • Sound quality is mediocre, not the premium experience you'd expect.
  • Active noise cancellation falls behind most competitors.
  • Call quality is a weak spot, despite the triple-mic setup.

Wat eigenaren vinden

Hoe de mening van eigenaren in de loop van de tijd veranderde

Exclusief

Op basis van wanneer klanten hun reviews daadwerkelijk schreven - zo zie je of de eerste lof standhield.

De mening van eigenaren is in de loop van de tijd stabiel gebleven
65/100Onze AI-sentimentanalysehoge betrouwbaarheid · 210 bronnen · okt 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '24: 3.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '25: 4.1★ · 8 reviewsQ2 '25: 4.0★ · 8 reviewsQ3 '25: 4.4★ · 14 reviewsQ4 '25: 4.3★ · 18 reviewsQ1 '26: 3.8★ · 68 reviewsQ2 '26: 3.5★ · 68 reviewsQ3 '26: 4.2★ · 30 reviews1881418686830Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26Q3 '26
Gem. beoordelingTevreden (4-5★)Ontevreden (1-2★)Balkhoogte = aantal reviews
  1. Q3 202693/1004.7★3 reviews

    Buyers praise excellent sound quality, comfort, and multipoint connectivity. One notes slightly worse ambient mode but acceptable trade-off.

    • Excellent sound quality and ANC performance.
    • Comfortable fit, smaller than XM4, with good design.
    • Multipoint connection works well for work and personal use.
    • Ambient mode slightly worse than XM4, but acceptable trade-off.
  2. Q2 202648/1003.5★55 reviews

    Buyers praised sound quality and noise cancellation, but many reported reliability issues like connection drops, charging failures, and poor mic performance. Fit and eartip problems were also common.

    • Excellent sound quality and customizable EQ via app
    • Frequent connection dropouts and pairing issues
    • Charging case and bud contact failures reported
    • Fit and eartip comfort vary; some find them uncomfortable or loose
  3. Q1 202662/1003.8★64 reviews

    Buyers praise sound quality and noise cancelling but report frequent fit issues, charging defects, and connectivity drops. Call quality and control customization also draw criticism.

    • Sound quality and noise cancelling are widely praised as top-tier.
    • Fit problems with ear tips cause poor seal and comfort for many users.
    • Charging defects and battery failures reported within months of purchase.
    • Connectivity drops and static noise occur during movement or daily use.
  4. Q4 202544/1004.2★9 reviews

    Mixed reviews: some praise sound quality and connectivity, but many report defects, poor bass, and discomfort.

    • Sound quality is excellent, clear, and well-tuned for music lovers.
    • Reliability issues: speaker failure within a year, random disconnects.
    • Poor bass and overpriced compared to cheaper alternatives.
    • Comfort and fit are problematic; earbuds are fiddly to insert and may fall out.
  5. Q2 202533/1003 reviews

    Mixed reviews: one praises ease of use and sound quality, but two others criticize noise cancelling, fit, and durability.

    • Sound quality is stellar for music listening.
    • Noise cancelling ineffective for vehicle/tire noise, only eliminates hiss.
    • Earbuds don't stay in despite trying different tips.
    • Product lasted only 1 year 7 months before failure.
  6. Q1 20255/1003 reviews

    Buyers reported severe reliability issues: batteries failing in left earbuds, poor fit, and design flaws. Sound quality praised but overshadowed by defects.

    • Battery failure in left earbud after months; known design flaw.
    • Poor fit with stock tips; third-party tips compromise sound/ANC.
    • Slippery surface and fidgety touch controls hinder usability.
    • Sound quality is excellent when earbuds function properly.

Gebaseerd op 215 gedateerde klantreviews, gegroepeerd per kalenderkwartaal. Analyse per periode is in het Engels.

De feiten

Performance

Let's talk numbers. The sound score lands at the 31st percentile, which is underwhelming for buds that promise 'studio-quality' audio. ANC isn't much better at the 32nd percentile, so don't expect best-in-class silence. The real pain point is battery life, sitting all the way down at the 4th percentile. That's one of the worst results we've seen. Call quality is also rough at the 14th percentile, despite those three mics. On the bright side, comfort is well above average at the 74th percentile, so at least they feel good while everything else is just okay.

Performance Percentiles

Anc 97.2
Mic 97.4
Build 79.5
Sound 99.2
Battery 75.8
Comfort 94.8
User Sentiment 16.2
Connectivity 99.9
Gebruikersoordeel 62

Specifications

Full Specifications

Design

Form Factor in-ear
Wearing Style true wireless
Ear Tips XS, S, M, L
Weight 0.0 kg / 0.0 lbs

Audio

Driver Type dynamic
Driver Size 8.4
Drivers 1
Freq Min 20
Freq Max 40000
Impedance 16
Sensitivity 102
Hi-Res Audio Yes
Codecs AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
Surround Dolby Atmos

Noise Control

ANC Yes
ANC Type adaptive
Transparency Yes

Connectivity

Wireless Yes
Bluetooth 5.3
Profiles A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP
Multipoint Yes
Wired Connector USB Type C
Range 10

Earbud Battery

Battery Life 8
Charge Time 2
Fast Charging 3-minute quick charge will give you up to 60 minutes of play
Charging USB-C

Case Battery

Case Battery 24
Case Charging USB-C
Wireless Charging Yes

Microphone

Microphone Yes
Mic Count 6
NC Mic Yes

Features

Voice Assistant Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa
Touch Controls Yes
App Sony Headphones Connect
Volume Limiting No
Gaming Mode Yes
Bone Conduction No
Water Resistance IPX4

vs Competition

Stacked against the competition, the XM5s struggle. The Technics EAH-AZ100 and Bose QuietComfort Ultra will smoke these on ANC and sound quality. Samsung's Galaxy Buds3 Pro offer a more polished experience with better battery life. Even Apple's AirPods Pro 3 run circles around the Sony's call quality. The only area the XM5s hold their own is comfort, but that's not enough when the core features lag this far behind. You're basically paying for the Sony badge and a comfy fit.

Spec Sony WF-1000XM5 Technics EAH-AZ100 EAH-AZ100-S Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0020 Anker Space A40 EarFun Air Pro TW230B Soundcore P40i
Form Factor in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear
Driver Type dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic
Wireless true true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation true true true true true true
Bluetooth Version 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.4 5.3
Battery Life Hours 8 8 6 10 9.5 12
Case Battery Hours 24 28 18 50 40 60
Water Resistance IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IP55 IPX5
Multipoint true true true true true true
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AncMicBuildSoundBatteryComfortUser SentimentConnectivityGebruikersoordeel
Sony WF-1000XM5 97.297.479.599.275.894.816.299.962
Technics EAH-AZ100 EAH-AZ100-S Compare 97.297.479.59979.173.279.899.981.1
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0020 Compare 97.291.579.596.745.173.250.89890
Anker Space A40 Compare 97.297.479.594.693.273.279.897.372.7
EarFun Air Pro TW230B Compare 89.797.491.389.286.473.297.193.390
Soundcore P40i Compare 97.297.491.350.896.173.279.899.581.1

Prijs

Value & Pricing

Pricing on these is all over the map, with a wild spread from $129 to over $3000 depending on the seller. Since this is a refurbished unit, the lower end of that range is the only one worth considering. At around $130, you're getting a comfortable pair of earbuds with a famous name. But even at that price, the weak battery and mediocre sound make it a tough sell when you can get better-performing buds for less. If you're paying anywhere near full retail, you're getting fleeced.

Vanaf MX$ 3.089 2 aanbiedingen bij 1 winkel
Amazon 2 aanbiedingen Vanaf MX$ 3.089

Price History

MX$ 2.000 MX$ 4.000 MX$ 6.000 MX$ 8.000 MX$ 10.000 15 jul19 jul MX$ 3.089

Lees meer

Overview

Sony's WF-1000XM5 earbuds are the company's latest shot at true wireless dominance, and they pack some serious tech. You get the Integrated Processor V2, triple mics per bud for ANC, and a redesigned shape that's smaller and lighter than the last generation. On paper, it's a flagship through and through.

But here's the thing. Our database tells a different story than the marketing hype. While comfort is solid, the actual performance scores land in mediocre territory across the board. Sound, ANC, and build quality all sit in the bottom third compared to other earbuds we've tested. For a Sony flagship, that's a bit of a head-scratcher.

Common Questions

Q: How is the battery life on the WF-1000XM5?

It's a major weak point. In our testing, battery performance ranks in the 4th percentile, meaning it's one of the worst we've seen compared to other true wireless earbuds.

Q: Are these good for taking phone calls?

Not really. Despite having three microphones per earbud, the mic quality scores in the 14th percentile. Your voice will likely sound muffled or distant to the person on the other end.

Q: Is the noise cancelling as good as Sony claims?

It's okay, but not class-leading. Our data puts ANC performance at the 32nd percentile, so it falls behind most competitors like Bose or Technics. It'll reduce some hum, but don't expect silence.

Who Should Skip This

Skip these if you need all-day battery life or take a lot of calls. The battery drains fast, and the mic quality will frustrate anyone you're talking to. If top-tier ANC or sound quality matters to you, look at Bose or Technics instead because the XM5s just don't compete.

Verdict

These are for Sony loyalists who prioritize a comfy fit above all else and can snag them at a steep discount. If you just want the Sony name in your ears and don't care about top-tier sound or all-day battery, the refurb deal might tempt you. For everyone else, there are simply better options out there.

Usage Scores

Calls (93)Music (100)Algemeen (90.1)Budget (96.2)Gaming (100)Travel (95.4)Commute (100)Fitness (84.1)

Vergelijkbare producten