Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
Alienware
81 Totaalscore
vs
Samsung QH43C 43"
Samsung
43 Totaalscore
Scores
Gaming
Office
Entertainment
Creative
Professional
Portable
Specificaties
| Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" | Samsung QH43C 43" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 32" | 43" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | VA | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | — |
| Curvature | 1,500 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 180 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms★ | 8 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits | 700 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | DCI-P3 95% | 1.07 Billion Colors |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | — |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 0★ | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 200x200 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 33W★ | — |
| Weight | 9.19 kg★ | 9.30 kg |
Voor- & Nadelen
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong color (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
Samsung QH43C 43"
- Strong display (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong color (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average portability (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average performance (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
Prijzen
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo0.010score per dollar
vs
Samsung QH43C 43"0.002score per dollar
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo biedt 5.0x betere prijs-kwaliteit
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
Samsung QH43C 43"
Oordeel
Winnaar: Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32"
Scores 81 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 25 specs.
