SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
SanDisk
90 종합 점수
vs
Lexar NM620
Lexar
49 종합 점수
점수
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
사양
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Lexar NM620 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 3 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 데이터 없음 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 데이터 없음 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | — |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | 데이터 없음 | |
| MTBF (hours) | 데이터 없음 | |
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
장단점
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
Lexar NM620
- Strong social proof (70th percentile)
- Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile
결론
승자: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.