Corsair (CMH32GX4M2E3200C16)
Corsair
73 종합 점수
vs
Timetec 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11
Timetec
36 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Corsair | Timetec 8GB DDR3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4★ | DDR3 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 240 |
| Rank | — | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16 | 11★ |
| Timings | 16-20-20-38 | — |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
장단점
Corsair (CMH32GX4M2E3200C16)
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
Timetec 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
가격
Corsair (CMH32GX4M2E3200C16)0.010달러당 점수
vs
Timetec 8GB DDR3-1600 CL110.078달러당 점수
Timetec 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11 7.8배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Corsair
Scores 73 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.
