Timetec 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM
Timetec
29 종합 점수
vs
Kingston ValueRAM
Kingston
57 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Timetec 4GB DDR3 SODIMM | Kingston ValueRAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 204 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | Single-rank |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 11★ | 52 |
| Timings | — | 52-52-52 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | INTEL XMP |
| Features | ||
| RGB | — | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | — | ✗ |
장단점
Timetec 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM
- Strong affordability (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average capacity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
Kingston ValueRAM
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (65th percentile)
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average latency (26th percentile)
가격
Timetec 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM0.050달러당 점수
vs
Kingston ValueRAM0.012달러당 점수
Timetec 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM 4.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Kingston ValueRAM
Scores 57 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
