Kingston ValueRam 16GB DDR5-6400 CL52 Green
Kingston
55 종합 점수
vs
Team Group (CTCWD564G6400HC34BDC01)
Team Group
86 종합 점수
점수
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Server
사양
| Kingston ValueRam | Team Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 52 | 34★ |
| Timings | 52-52-52 | 34-44-44-84 |
| Voltage | 1.100000023841858★ | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
장단점
Kingston ValueRam 16GB DDR5-6400 CL52 Green
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average latency (26th percentile)
- Below average affordability (32nd percentile)
Team Group (CTCWD564G6400HC34BDC01)
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong latency (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average affordability (11th percentile)11th %ile
가격
Kingston ValueRam 16GB DDR5-6400 CL52 Green0.004달러당 점수
vs
Team Group (CTCWD564G6400HC34BDC01)0.003달러당 점수
Kingston ValueRam 16GB DDR5-6400 CL52 Green 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Team Group
Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
