Team Group (FF3D532G6000HC30DC01)
Team Group
83 종합 점수
vs
Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266)
Crucial
50 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Team Group | Crucial | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 30 | 16★ |
| Timings | 30-36-36-76 | 16-18-18-36 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | — |
장단점
Team Group (FF3D532G6000HC30DC01)
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average affordability (24th percentile)
Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266)
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong affordability (78th percentile)
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
가격
Team Group (FF3D532G6000HC30DC01)0.006달러당 점수
vs
Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266)0.030달러당 점수
Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266) 5.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Team Group
Scores 83 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.
