Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
Corsair
95 종합 점수
vs
Netac Shadow
Netac
65 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Server
사양
| Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W | Netac Shadow | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32 | 16★ |
| Timings | 32-40-40-84 | — |
| Voltage | 1.399999976158142 | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
Netac Shadow
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Strong social proof (70th percentile)
가격
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W0.004달러당 점수
vs
Netac Shadow0.012달러당 점수
Netac Shadow 3.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 15 specs.
