Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Jet Black 128GB
Samsung
45 종합 점수
vs
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Black Titanium 256GB
Apple
86 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Flagship
Photography
Foldable
Battery Life
Rugged
Business
Compact
사양
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Display Type | AMOLED★ | Super Retina XDR |
| Resolution | — | 2868 x 1320 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness | — | 1600 nits★ |
| HDR | ✓ | ✓ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | — | Apple A18 Pro |
| Processor Model | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Apple A18 Pro |
| CPU Cores | — | 6★ |
| CPU Speed | — | 4.05★ |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB★ |
| Expandable | — | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP★ | 48 MP |
| Camera Count | 3 | 3 |
| Ultrawide | — | 48 MP★ |
| Telephoto | — | 12 MP★ |
| Front Camera | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Optical Zoom | — | 5x★ |
| Video | 4k | 4K@60fps |
| OIS | — | ✓★ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 4,755 mAh★ | 4,685 mAh |
| Wired Charging | — | 30W★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Fast Charging | — | Fast-charge capable |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | eSIM |
| eSIM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | — | IP68★ |
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | — | 0.23 kg★ |
| Fingerprint | in-display | — |
| Face Recognition | ✓ | ✓ |
| OS | Android | iOS |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Jet Black 128GB
- Strong performance (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong connectivity (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong display (75th percentile)
- Below average social proof (32nd percentile)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Black Titanium 256GB
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
결론
승자: Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 14 of 41 specs.