Xiaomi Redmi Pad 25040RP0AL Mint Green 256GB
Xiaomi
32 종합 점수
vs
Apple iPhone 16 16 Black 128GB
Apple
85 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Compact
Foldable
Photography
Business
Gaming
Flagship
Battery Life
Rugged
사양
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 25040RP0AL | Apple iPhone 16 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | — | 6.1 |
| Display Type | — | Super Retina XDR |
| Resolution | — | 2556 x 1179 |
| Refresh Rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 2000 nits★ |
| HDR | ✓ | ✓ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | — | A18 chip |
| Processor Model | MediaTek Helio G100-Ultra | A18 |
| CPU Cores | 8★ | 6 |
| CPU Speed | 2.20 | 4.04★ |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB★ | 128 GB |
| Expandable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 8 MP | 48 MP★ |
| Camera Count | 1 | 2★ |
| Ultrawide | — | 12 MP★ |
| Telephoto | — | 12 MP★ |
| Front Camera | 5 MP | 12 MP★ |
| Optical Zoom | — | 2x★ |
| Video | 1080P | 4K@60fps★ |
| OIS | — | ✓★ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 9,000 mAh★ | 3,561 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 15W | 20W★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Fast Charging | 15W Fast charging | MagSafe |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6★ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | — | ✓★ |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB-C★ |
| SIM | — | eSIM |
| eSIM | — | ✓★ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | — | IP68★ |
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | — | 0.17 kg★ |
| Face Recognition | ✗ | ✓★ |
| OS | Android | iOS |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 25040RP0AL Mint Green 256GB
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average camera (22nd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (33rd percentile)
Apple iPhone 16 16 Black 128GB
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong display (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong performance (87th percentile)87th %ile
결론
승자: Apple iPhone 16 16
Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 21 of 40 specs.