Viltrox
Viltrox
28 종합 점수
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
99 종합 점수
점수
Landscape
Budget
Macro
Travel
Portrait
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Street
사양
| Viltrox | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 90 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 90 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | — | 20 |
| Groups | — | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Coating | — | water- and oil-repellent coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.2 | 3.5-6.7 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.61 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | HLA |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 170 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2★ |
장단점
Viltrox
- Strong aperture (70th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (69th percentile)
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average build (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
가격
Viltrox0.006달러당 점수
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.008달러당 점수
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 99 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.
