Laowa 7.5mm f/2 Lightweight 8mm
Laowa
51 종합 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
83 종합 점수
점수
Street
Travel
Budget
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Macro
사양
| Laowa 7.5mm f/2 Lightweight 8mm | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 8 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 8 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 9 |
| Groups | 9 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.15 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | PZ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 249 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.11x | 0.215x★ |
장단점
Laowa 7.5mm f/2 Lightweight 8mm
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (35th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong aperture (77th percentile)
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
가격
Laowa 7.5mm f/2 Lightweight 8mm0.003달러당 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.025달러당 점수
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm 8.3배 더 나은 가성비
Laowa 7.5mm f/2 Lightweight 8mm
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
결론
승자: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 83 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.
