Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 종합 점수
vs
Elite Brands Inc XN35-C

Elite Brands Inc XN35-C

Elite Brands Inc
30 종합 점수

점수

Portrait
Sigma
59
Elite Brands Inc
51
Budget
Sigma
56
Elite Brands Inc
22
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Elite Brands Inc
35
Street
Sigma
46
Elite Brands Inc
30
Macro
Sigma
16
Elite Brands Inc
43
Professional
Sigma
42
Elite Brands Inc
32
Travel
Sigma
40
Elite Brands Inc
10
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Elite Brands Inc
16
Landscape
Sigma
33
Elite Brands Inc
15

사양

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSElite Brands Inc XN35-C
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm35 mm
CoatingXEEN X-Coating Technology
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades11
Build
MountCanon EF
Formatfull-frame
Weight1.23 kg
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm

장단점

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Elite Brands Inc XN35-C

  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

결론

승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 14 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 더 나은 점:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Elite Brands Inc XN35-C 더 나은 점:

Macro