Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 종합 점수
vs
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
Canon
72 종합 점수
점수
Travel
Budget
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Professional
Portrait
Street
Video Cinema
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 105 mm |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | Super Spectra Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/24 |
| Min Aperture | — | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon RF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.40 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | STM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 201 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2★ |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average bokeh (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
가격
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No current pricing available
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
결론
승자: Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
Scores 72 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 20 specs.
