Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

Insta360
35 종합 점수
vs
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron
68 종합 점수

점수

Travel
Insta360
17
Tamron
78
Macro
Insta360
16
Tamron
76
Budget
Insta360
36
Tamron
76
Landscape
Insta360
15
Tamron
73
Portrait
Insta360
65
Tamron
52
Street
Insta360
45
Tamron
63
Wildlife Sports
Insta360
32
Tamron
61
Professional
Insta360
40
Tamron
59
Video Cinema
Insta360
46
Tamron
59

사양

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mmTamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Optics
Typefisheyezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements17
Groups13
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingInternal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.94f/18
Min Aperturef/1.943.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountInsta360 X4 AirNikon F
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.40 kg
Filter Thread62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance498 mm
Max Magnification1:3.7

장단점

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

  • Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average build (31st percentile)

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

결론

승자: Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Scores 68 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm 더 나은 점:

Portrait

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports