Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 종합 점수
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Zeiss
71 종합 점수

점수

Travel
Sony
94
Zeiss
51
Budget
Sony
91
Zeiss
69
Street
Sony
90
Zeiss
68
Wildlife Sports
Sony
89
Zeiss
66
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Zeiss
77
Landscape
Sony
83
Zeiss
60
Professional
Sony
81
Zeiss
81
Portrait
Sony
81
Zeiss
81
Macro
Sony
66
Zeiss
48

사양

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSZeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm135 mm
Elements914
Groups811
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Coating—ZEISS T* coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread41 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★—
Max Magnification0.215x★—

장단점

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

가격

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is MX$24,154 cheaper (8.4x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.028달러당 점수
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm0.003달러당 점수

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 9.3배 더 나은 가성비

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

결론

★ 승자: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요