Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
90 종합 점수
vs
XuanLens ORF 32mm
XuanLens
51 종합 점수
점수
Travel
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
사양
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | XuanLens ORF 32mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 32 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 32 mm |
| Elements | 9 | — |
| Groups | 8 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/10 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/10 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.11 kg | 0.04 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 32 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | — |
장단점
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
XuanLens ORF 32mm
- Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
가격
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.028달러당 점수
vs
XuanLens ORF 32mm0.093달러당 점수
XuanLens ORF 32mm 3.3배 더 나은 가성비
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
XuanLens ORF 32mm
결론
승자: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
