Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
90 종합 점수
vs
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
Ricoh
71 종합 점수
점수
Travel
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
사양
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 40 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 40 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 7 |
| Groups | 8 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 1★ | 0 |
| Coating | — | Nano Crystal Coat |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | GR |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.26 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 46 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | AF híbrido |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops | 4 stops |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 120 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | — |
장단점
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
가격
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.028달러당 점수
vs
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm0.003달러당 점수
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 9.3배 더 나은 가성비
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
결론
승자: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
