HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E
HK Meike
58 종합 점수
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
90 종합 점수
점수
Travel
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
사양
| HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 9 |
| Groups | 9 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| Coating | Multilayered Coatings | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 11★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.29 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 450 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
장단점
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong build (78th percentile)
- Strong optical (67th percentile)
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
가격
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E0.014달러당 점수
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.028달러당 점수
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
결론
승자: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
