Microsoft Surface Pro 12.3" Surface Pro 4 2015
Microsoft
51 종합 점수
vs
Lenovo Yoga 7 14" 83JR0001US Seashell 2025
Lenovo
81 종합 점수
점수
Entertainment
Compact
Student
Business
Creator
Developer
Gaming
Ai Llm
사양
| Microsoft Surface Pro 12.3" Surface Pro 4 | Lenovo Yoga 7 14" 83JR0001US | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Intel Core i5-6300U | AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| Cores | 2 | 8★ |
| Frequency | — | 2.0 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Intel HD Graphics 520 | AMD Radeon 860M★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | 데이터 없음 | |
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | 48 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | GDDR6★ | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage 1 | 256 GB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 12.3" | 14" |
| Resolution | 2736 px★ | 1920 px |
| Panel | — | OLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | — | 60 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 600 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 100% DCI-P3 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 2★ |
| USB Ports | — | 1★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | DisplayPort 1.4 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | — | 1.40 kg★ |
| Battery | — | 70 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit | Windows 11 Home |
장단점
Microsoft Surface Pro 12.3" Surface Pro 4 2015
- Strong gpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong compact (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong screen (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong reliability (79th percentile)
- Below average cpu (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average port (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average ram (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average storage (19th percentile)19th %ile
Lenovo Yoga 7 14" 83JR0001US Seashell 2025
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong screen (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong compact (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong reliability (79th percentile)
가격
Microsoft Surface Pro 12.3" Surface Pro 4 2015
No current pricing available
Lenovo Yoga 7 14" 83JR0001US Seashell 2025
결론
승자: Lenovo Yoga 7 14" 83JR0001US
Scores 81 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 28 specs.
