Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 종합 점수
vs
JBL JR JBLJR460NCWHTAM

JBL JR JBLJR460NCWHTAM

JBL
38 종합 점수

점수

Budget
Beyerdynamic
86
JBL
49
Commute
Beyerdynamic
84
JBL
25
Gaming
Beyerdynamic
82
JBL
38
Music
Beyerdynamic
82
JBL
24
Work
Beyerdynamic
80
JBL
33
Studio
Beyerdynamic
78
JBL
20
Calls
Beyerdynamic
69
JBL
29

사양

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609JBL JR JBLJR460NCWHTAM
Design
Form Factoron-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.22 kg0.20 kg
Ear Cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size45 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz
Impedance48 Ω32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life40 hrs20 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs2 hrs
Fast Charging15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
Appbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

장단점

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

JBL JR JBLJR460NCWHTAM

  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong anc (77th percentile)
  • Strong mic (74th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
  • Below average battery (24th percentile)
  • Below average sound (24th percentile)

가격

JBL JR JBLJR460NCWHTAM is MX$2,998 cheaper (2.3x less).

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

JBL JR JBLJR460NCWHTAM

결론

승자: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 39 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 더 나은 점:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

이것도 고려해보세요