JBL Tune 770NC
JBL
87 종합 점수
vs
Sony MDR-M1 MDRM1
Sony
43 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Commute
Work
Music
Gaming
Calls
Studio
사양
| JBL Tune 770NC | Sony MDR-M1 MDRM1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.23 kg★ | 0.48 kg |
| Headband | Plastic | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 5 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 80 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 50 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | JBL Tune 770NC - Adaptive Noise Cancelling with Smart Ambient Wireless Over-Ear Headphones, Bluetooth 5.3, Up to 70H Battery Life with Speed Charge, Lightweight, Comfortable & Foldable Design (Black) | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | — | 2.5 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 70 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5min=3hrs | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | — |
| App | JBL Headphones | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | — |
장단점
JBL Tune 770NC
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong battery (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
Sony MDR-M1 MDRM1
- Strong social proof (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average comfort (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
가격
JBL Tune 770NC0.031달러당 점수
vs
Sony MDR-M1 MDRM10.008달러당 점수
JBL Tune 770NC 3.9배 더 나은 가성비
JBL Tune 770NC
Sony MDR-M1 MDRM1
결론
승자: JBL Tune 770NC
Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 34 specs.
