Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk2
Fostex
36 종합 점수
vs
Audeze LCD-2 Classic
Audeze
48 종합 점수
점수
Studio
Music
Budget
Gaming
Commute
Work
Calls
사양
| Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk2 | Audeze LCD-2 Classic | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | open |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.39 kg★ | — |
| Ear Cushion | protein leather | memory foam |
| Headband | — | steel |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | planar magnetic |
| Driver Size | 50 mm | 106 mm★ |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz★ | 10 Hz |
| Freq Max | 45 kHz | 50 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 25 Ω | 70 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 101 dB★ |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 6.35mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 3 m | — |
| Features | ||
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
장단점
Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk2
- Strong sound (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average comfort (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
- Below average social proof (33rd percentile)
Audeze LCD-2 Classic
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong comfort (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
가격
Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk20.001달러당 점수
vs
Audeze LCD-2 Classic0.003달러당 점수
Audeze LCD-2 Classic 3.0배 더 나은 가성비
Fostex TH-900 TH-900mk2
Audeze LCD-2 Classic
결론
승자: Audeze LCD-2 Classic
Scores 48 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 4 of 18 specs.
