TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
83 종합 점수
vs
XIAOWTEK S66

XIAOWTEK S66

XIAOWTEK
49 종합 점수

점수

Budget
TOZO
79
XIAOWTEK
47
Gaming
TOZO
79
XIAOWTEK
46
Travel
TOZO
76
XIAOWTEK
43
Fitness
TOZO
73
XIAOWTEK
26
Commute
TOZO
70
XIAOWTEK
42
Calls
TOZO
69
XIAOWTEK
44
Music
TOZO
69
XIAOWTEK
37

사양

TOZO Crystal PodsXIAOWTEK S66
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm13.399999618530273 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACWireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones with 50H Playback, Deep Bass Stereo Ear Buds Clear Calls with LED Power Display, IPX7 Waterproof, in-Ear Earphones with Mic for Phone/Android/iPad, Gray
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs50 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count42
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX7

장단점

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong anc (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile

XIAOWTEK S66

  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong battery (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong mic (79th percentile)
  • Strong user sentiment (79th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (33rd percentile)

결론

승자: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 83 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods 더 나은 점:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness