JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3PURAM
JBL
81 종합 점수
vs
JVC HAA4TB
JVC
56 종합 점수
점수
Travel
Budget
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Gaming
Music
사양
| JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3PURAM | JVC HAA4TB | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | stick-closed earbuds | true wireless |
| Weight | 0.08 kg | 0.07 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 12 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | JBL Live Beam 3 - True wireless noise-cancelling stick-closed earbuds, 48Hrs total playback, Wireless Charging, 6 Mics for perfect calls, Multi-point connection, IP55 waterproof and dustproof (Purple) | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 12 hrs | 26 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 4 hour playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 48 hrs★ | 18 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google Assistant | Voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | JBL Headphones App | — |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | IPX4 |
장단점
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3PURAM
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
JVC HAA4TB
- Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong connectivity (77th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
가격
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3PURAM0.021달러당 점수
vs
JVC HAA4TB0.115달러당 점수
JVC HAA4TB 5.5배 더 나은 가성비
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3PURAM
JVC HAA4TB
결론
승자: JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3PURAM
Scores 81 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 29 specs.
