QCY MeloBuds N20

QCY MeloBuds N20

QCY
69 종합 점수
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 종합 점수

점수

Calls
QCY
67
Technics
100
Travel
QCY
71
Technics
100
Music
QCY
56
Technics
94
Budget
QCY
62
Technics
94
Commute
QCY
64
Technics
92
Gaming
QCY
75
Technics
90
Fitness
QCY
62
Technics
85

사양

QCY MeloBuds N20Technics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing StyleBudtrue wireless
Ear TipsS5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.08 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver TypedynamicDynamic
Driver Size13 mm10 mm
Drivers11
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max3 kHz40 kHz
Impedance20 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, SBCAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptiveadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth6.05.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorUSB Type CBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life10 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time0.17000000178813934 hrs2.5 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 2 hours playback15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery40 hrs28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count66
NC Mic
Features
Touch Controls
AppQCY APPAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4IPX4

장단점

QCY MeloBuds N20

  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

결론

승자: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 6 of 38 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 더 나은 점:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness