Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
96 종합 점수
vs
Linsoul KZ AS16 Pro AS16 Pro
Linsoul
40 종합 점수
점수
Calls
Travel
Budget
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
사양
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Linsoul KZ AS16 Pro AS16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | balanced armature |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1 | 8★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz | 40 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 23.5 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 111 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | Linsoul KZ AS16 Pro Wired Earbuds, 16BA Balanced Armature Drivers Earphones HiFi Bass in Ear Monitor Earphones with Detachable 0.75mm 2 pin Cable (Cyan, Without Mic) |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
장단점
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
Linsoul KZ AS16 Pro AS16 Pro
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average mic (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
가격
Technics EAH-AZ1000.022달러당 점수
vs
Linsoul KZ AS16 Pro AS16 Pro0.027달러당 점수
Linsoul KZ AS16 Pro AS16 Pro 1.2배 더 나은 가성비
Technics EAH-AZ100
Linsoul KZ AS16 Pro AS16 Pro
결론
승자: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.
