JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
JBL
86 종합 점수
vs
Shokz 2 Opencomm2
Shokz
32 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Fitness
Travel
Calls
Gaming
Commute
Music
사양
| JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM | Shokz 2 Opencomm2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | — |
| Weight | 0.08 kg | 0.04 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | bone conduction |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | 96 dB |
| Max SPL | 96 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.0 |
| Profiles | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 12 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 10 Minutes for 4 Hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 36 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Capacity | 68 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | JBL Headphones | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | Water-Resistant |
장단점
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Shokz 2 Opencomm2
- Strong build (72nd percentile)
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Below average battery (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
가격
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM0.033달러당 점수
vs
Shokz 2 Opencomm20.008달러당 점수
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM 4.1배 더 나은 가성비
JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
Shokz 2 Opencomm2
결론
승자: JBL Live Beam JBLLIVEBEAM3SILAM
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 36 specs.
