CyberPowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR GXiVR8060A35
CyberPowerPC
63 종합 점수
vs
HP OMEN GT22-3080 Black 2025
HP
100 종합 점수
점수
Home Office
Gaming
Creator
Developer
Workstation
Business
Ai Llm
Compact
사양
| CyberPowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR GXiVR8060A35 | HP OMEN GT22-3080 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 10 | 20★ |
| Frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB | 30 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | discrete |
| VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 2 TB | 2 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mid-tower | mid-tower |
| PSU | — | 850W★ |
| Weight | 15.54 kg | 22.60 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| USB Ports | 7★ | 6 |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 4 x 1 |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1b |
| DisplayPort | 2x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Pro |
장단점
CyberPowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR GXiVR8060A35
- Strong storage (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong port selection (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong gpu (74th percentile)
- Strong cpu (70th percentile)
- Below average reliability (27th percentile)
- Below average social proof (32nd percentile)
HP OMEN GT22-3080 Black 2025
- Strong cpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong port selection (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong storage (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong gpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
가격
CyberPowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR GXiVR8060A350.002달러당 점수
vs
HP OMEN GT22-3080 Black 20250.001달러당 점수
CyberPowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR GXiVR8060A35 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
CyberPowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR GXiVR8060A35
HP OMEN GT22-3080 Black 2025
결론
승자: HP OMEN GT22-3080
Scores 100 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.
