Intel Core Ultra 270K 24-core LGA1851
Intel
64 종합 점수
vs
SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5
SMC
80 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
사양
| Intel Core Ultra 270K | SMC EPYC 9555P | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Core Ultra 7 | EPYC |
| Model | 270K | 9555P |
| Codename | — | Turin |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 4★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 24 | 64★ |
| P-cores | — | 64★ |
| Threads | 데이터 없음 | |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 64★ |
| L3 Cache | 데이터 없음 | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1851 | AMD Socket SP5 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 데이터 없음 | |
| TDP | — | 360★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 400★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
장단점
Intel Core Ultra 270K 24-core LGA1851
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
- Below average affordability (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5
- Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong efficiency (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average affordability (1st percentile)1st %ile
결론
승자: SMC EPYC 9555P
Scores 80 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 24 specs.