Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6-core LGA2011-3
Intel
48 종합 점수
점수
Server
Productivity
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Budget
Gaming
사양
| Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5 | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Xeon |
| Model | 000 | E5-2620 v3 |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 22★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 6★ |
| Threads | — | 12★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 1.5★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 15★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA2011-3 |
| TDP | — | 85★ |
장단점
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6-core LGA2011-3
- Strong platform (72nd percentile)
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
가격
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM50.019달러당 점수
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6-core LGA2011-30.022달러당 점수
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6-core LGA2011-3 1.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Scores 48 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 19 specs.
