MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 종합 점수
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-core sTRX4
AMD
79 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
사양
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | AMD |
| Series | — | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Model | — | 3970X |
| Codename | — | Zen 2 |
| Class | — | hedt |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 32★ |
| Threads | — | 64★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 16★ |
| L3 Cache | 데이터 없음 | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Channels | — | 4★ |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | sTRX4 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 64★ |
| TDP | — | 280★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
장단점
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-core sTRX4
- Strong ai (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong platform (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
가격
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.003달러당 점수
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-core sTRX40.002달러당 점수
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF 1.5배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Scores 79 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 23 specs.
