MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 종합 점수
vs
AMD EPYC 4545P 16-core AM5
AMD
73 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
사양
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | AMD EPYC 4545P | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | AMD |
| Series | — | EPYC |
| Model | — | 4545P |
| Class | — | server |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | — | 32★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L3 Cache | — | 64★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | AM5 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 64★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
장단점
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
AMD EPYC 4545P 16-core AM5
- Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong single thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong ai (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong multi thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average affordability (12th percentile)12th %ile
가격
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.003달러당 점수
vs
AMD EPYC 4545P 16-core AM50.004달러당 점수
AMD EPYC 4545P 16-core AM5 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: AMD EPYC 4545P
Scores 73 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 19 specs.
