MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 종합 점수
vs
AMD EPYC 9355P 32-core SP5
AMD
80 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
사양
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | AMD EPYC 9355P | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | AMD |
| Series | — | EPYC |
| Model | — | 9355P |
| Codename | — | Turin |
| Class | — | server |
| Process | — | 4★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 32★ |
| P-cores | — | 32★ |
| Threads | — | 64★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 32★ |
| L3 Cache | 데이터 없음 | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | SP5 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 데이터 없음 | |
| TDP | — | 280★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 300★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
장단점
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
AMD EPYC 9355P 32-core SP5
- Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong efficiency (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average affordability (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
가격
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
AMD EPYC 9355P 32-core SP5
No current pricing available
결론
승자: AMD EPYC 9355P
Scores 80 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 24 specs.
