fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud
fosa1
26 종합 점수
vs
AMD 100-000000312
AMD
81 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Budget
Gaming
Efficiency
사양
| fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud | AMD 100-000000312 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | — | EPYC |
| Model | X5650 | 7763 |
| Codename | — | Milan |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 6 | 64★ |
| P-cores | — | 64★ |
| Threads | ||
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 32★ |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 3★ | — |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1366 | LGA 4094 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 데이터 없음 | |
| TDP | 95★ | 280 |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
장단점
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud
- Strong platform (65th percentile)
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average multi thread (25th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (25th percentile)
- Below average ai (26th percentile)
AMD 100-000000312
- Strong multi thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ai (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong efficiency (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong platform (84th percentile)84th %ile
가격
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud0.027달러당 점수
vs
AMD 100-0000003120.002달러당 점수
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud 13.5배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: AMD 100-000000312
Scores 81 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 25 specs.
