Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
vs
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
Intel
43 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Productivity
Efficiency
Server
Ai Llm
사양
| Thermal Grizzly 000 | Intel Celeron G5900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Celeron |
| Model | 000 | G5900 |
| Codename | — | Comet Lake |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 2★ |
| P-cores | — | 4★ |
| Threads | — | 2★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 1★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 2★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA 1200 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 58★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
장단점
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
- Strong affordability (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong platform (76th percentile)
- Below average ai (26th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (29th percentile)
가격
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM50.023달러당 점수
vs
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 12000.031달러당 점수
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Celeron G5900
Scores 43 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 25 specs.
