Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151
Intel
38 종합 점수
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Efficiency
Budget
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
사양
| Intel Celeron G3900 | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | — |
| Series | Celeron | — |
| Model | G3900 | — |
| Class | desktop | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 2★ | — |
| Threads | 2★ | — |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 0.5★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4★ | — |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1151 | — |
| TDP | 51★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 510 | — |
장단점
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average ai (24th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (27th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (35th percentile)
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
가격
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 11510.033달러당 점수
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.003달러당 점수
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151 11.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 16 specs.
