MSI MAG 321CQF E18 32" Metallic Black 2025
MSI
70 総合スコア
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
92 総合スコア
スコア
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
スペック
| MSI MAG 321CQF E18 32" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 32" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | VA | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,500 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 180 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 0.5 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 124% | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | 8-bit (8-Bit+FRC) | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | HDR Ready | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | HDR | HDR10+★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 0 | 3★ |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | — | 140W★ |
| Weight | 6.34 kg★ | 6.90 kg |
長所と短所
MSI MAG 321CQF E18 32" Metallic Black 2025
- Strong performance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong display (74th percentile)
- Strong color (70th percentile)
- Below average portability (4th percentile)4th %ile
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
価格
MSI MAG 321CQF E18 32" Metallic Black 20250.012ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.007ドルあたりのスコア
MSI MAG 321CQF E18 32" Metallic Black 2025 1.7倍のコストパフォーマンス
MSI MAG 321CQF E18 32" Metallic Black 2025
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
結論
勝者: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 29 specs.
