Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
Aten Technology
19 総合スコア
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
93 総合スコア
スコア
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
スペック
| Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 18.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | — | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | — | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | — | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | — | HDR10+★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 3★ |
| Speakers | — | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | — | 140W★ |
| Weight | 14.51 kg | 6.90 kg★ |
長所と短所
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
- Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average ergonomic (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average performance (23rd percentile)
- Below average feature (25th percentile)
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
価格
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White0.001ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 20250.007ドルあたりのスコア
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025 7.0倍のコストパフォーマンス
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
結論
勝者: Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27"
Scores 93 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.
