Razer Blade 14" RZ09-05306ES3-R3U1 Black 2025
Razer
73 総合スコア
vs
ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 16" GU605CR-XS97 Platinum White 2025
ASUS
76 総合スコア
スコア
Gaming
Creator
Developer
Entertainment
Compact
Student
Business
Ai Llm
スペック
| Razer Blade 14" RZ09-05306ES3-R3U1 | ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 16" GU605CR-XS97 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 10 | 16★ |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 2.9 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | discrete |
| VRAM | 8 GB | 12 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 2 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 16" |
| Resolution | 2880 px★ | 2560 px |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | Rec. 709, DCI-P3, sRGB, Adobe RGB | 100% DCI-P3 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Thunderbolt | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| HDMI | 1 x HDMI 2.1 output | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Gigabit Ethernet |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.84 kg★ | 1.95 kg |
| Battery | 72 Wh | 90 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Pro |
長所と短所
Razer Blade 14" RZ09-05306ES3-R3U1 Black 2025
- Strong screen (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong gpu (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ram (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average reliability (4th percentile)4th %ile
ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 16" GU605CR-XS97 Platinum White 2025
- Strong screen (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong storage (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong ram (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong port selection (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average portability (22nd percentile)
結論
勝者: ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 16" GU605CR-XS97
Scores 76 overall, wins 4 of 8 usage categories and 10 of 30 specs.