ASUS Vivobook 16 16" M1607KA Quiet Blue
ASUS
53 総合スコア
vs
Razer Blade 14" RZ09-05306ES3-R3U1 Black 2025
Razer
73 総合スコア
スコア
Gaming
Entertainment
Creator
Compact
Developer
Student
Business
Ai Llm
スペック
| ASUS Vivobook 16 16" M1607KA | Razer Blade 14" RZ09-05306ES3-R3U1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 8 | 10★ |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 16 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | AMD Radeon 860M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 8 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 16" | 14" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 2880 px★ |
| Panel | IPS | OLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 300 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | 45% NTSC | Rec. 709, DCI-P3, sRGB, Adobe RGB |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Thunderbolt | — | USB4 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | 1 x HDMI 2.1 output |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.88 kg | 1.84 kg★ |
| Battery | 42 Wh | 72 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
長所と短所
ASUS Vivobook 16 16" M1607KA Quiet Blue
- Strong storage (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong cpu (78th percentile)
- Strong screen (67th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average portability (24th percentile)
Razer Blade 14" RZ09-05306ES3-R3U1 Black 2025
- Strong screen (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong gpu (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ram (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average reliability (4th percentile)4th %ile
価格
ASUS Vivobook 16 16" M1607KA Quiet Blue
Razer Blade 14" RZ09-05306ES3-R3U1 Black 2025
No current pricing available
結論
勝者: Razer Blade 14" RZ09-05306ES3-R3U1
Scores 73 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 15 of 29 specs.
