Netac
Netac
66 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32
Corsair
95 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Server
Specifiche
| Netac | Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16★ | 32 |
| Timings | — | 32-40-40-84 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | 1.399999976158142 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
Pro e Contro
Netac
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
Prezzi
Netac0.013punteggio per dollaro
vs
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C320.003punteggio per dollaro
Netac offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 4.3x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 15 specs.
