Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A3084 Black Titanium 256GB
Apple
32 Punteggio complessivo
vs
ASUS ROG Phone ROG Phone 9 Pro 512GB
ASUS
74 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Gaming
Battery Life
Flagship
Foldable
Photography
Business
Budget
Rugged
Compact
Specifiche
| Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A3084 | ASUS ROG Phone ROG Phone 9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.9 | 6.8 |
| Display Type | Super Retina XDR | LTPO AMOLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | — | 185 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 2500 nits★ |
| HDR | ✓★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| Processor Model | Apple A18 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| CPU Cores | — | 8★ |
| RAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB★ |
| Storage Type | — | UFS 4.0★ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 48 MP | 50 MP★ |
| Camera Count | 3 | 3 |
| Ultrawide | — | 13 MP★ |
| Telephoto | — | 32 MP★ |
| Front Camera | — | 32 MP★ |
| Video | — | 8K★ |
| OIS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | — | 5,800 mAh★ |
| Wired Charging | — | 65W★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Fast Charging | — | PD 3.0, QC 5.0 |
| Connector | — | USB-C★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| NFC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.1★ |
| SIM | — | eSIM, nano-SIM |
| eSIM | — | ✓★ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | — | IP68★ |
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | 0.14 kg★ | — |
| Fingerprint | — | in-display |
| Face Recognition | — | ✓★ |
| OS | iOS | Android |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
Pro e Contro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A3084 Black Titanium 256GB
- Strong performance (79th percentile)
- Strong display (73rd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average battery (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (19th percentile)19th %ile
ASUS ROG Phone ROG Phone 9 Pro 512GB
- Strong performance (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Verdetto
Vincitore: ASUS ROG Phone ROG Phone 9 Pro
Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 24 of 35 specs.